Kevin Ranker

Ranker’s mini-dairy bill listed among the dead in Olympia


Written by | The Bellingham Herald | February 22, 2011

From Stark:

We’re at the point in the legislative session in which bills die by the dozen, because they have failed to move out of their house of origin by last week’s deadline.

Listed among the dead is SB 5648, sponsored by Sen. Kevin Ranker, D-40th. Ranker’s bill would have exempted  small-scale milk producers from the regulations imposed  by RCW 15.36.

Ranker’s dead bill defined “small scale” as no more than two cows, nine sheep, or nine goats, and exempted such mini-producers only if they do not advertise their milk for sale. It sounds as though the bill was meant to enable hobbyists to sell a little milk to friends and neighbors without being in violation of state law.

1 Comment

Pregnancy center regulation bill stirs up abortion debate


Written by | The Bellingham Herald | January 31, 2011

From Stark:

State Sen. Kevin Ranker, D-40th, is among 17 sponsors of SB 5274, which would regulate the operations of “pregnancy centers” maintained by pro-life groups that  encourage women not to choose abortions. A similar proposal is HB 1366 in the House.

Pro-choice advocates contend that these centers masquerade as health clinics and promote their anti-abortion agenda to women who should be getting information about all their legal and medical options.

According to NARAL, a national pro-choice group, the bill:

  • Requires the centers to disclose  that they do not provide service or referrals for abortion or comprehensive birth control and that they do not provide medical care for pregnant women.
  • Requires the centers to keep any medical information they collect private.
  • Requires the centers to provide pregnancy test results immediately.

The groups operating these centers argue that they are now providing millions of dollars’ worth of pregnancy testing and counseling to women in need, and that the provisions of the bill create potentially threatening civil liability for them. Among other things, the bill authorizes civil suits from women who contend they were damaged by the center’s activities, and give courts the power to triple any actual damages awarded.

Here’s the official summary of the bill.

Here’s the case in favor of the bill, from NARAL Pro-Choice Washington.

Here’s a negative view of the bill from a pro-life website, LifeNews.com

Here’s video of a Jan. 24 House hearing on the bill.

6 Comments
Top