BLOGS: Politics Traffic Sports Business Schools Consumer Shopping Healthy Eating Inside Mann Outdoors Garden
    • Local News
    • Blogs
    • Contests
    • Calendar
    • Announcements
    • Web cam
  • News
    • Local
    • Northwest
    • Nation
    • World
    • On Patrol
    • Traffic Cams
    • Forums
  • Sports
    • High schools
    • Colleges
    • NFL
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • NBA
    • Motorsports
    • Outdoors
    • CONTESTS
  • Business
    • Biz Blog
    • Business Registrations
    • Whatcom County Stocks
    • Whatcom Business Notes
    • Technology
  • Opinion
    • Letters to the editor
    • Submit letter
    • Forums
  • Entertainment
    • Calendar
    • Movies
    • Dining
    • GOBham
    • Horoscopes
    • Sudoku
    • Contests
    • Pets
  • Photos
    • Today in Photos
    • News
    • Sports
    • entertainment
    • Watch Video
    • Submit Video
    • Submit Photos
  • Obituaries
    • Place an obituary
    • Read national obituaries
  • Shopping
    • Coupons
    • Search Newspaper Ads
    • Place an Ad
    • Promote Your Product
  • Jobs
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
    • View Open Houses
    • Relocation Guide
    • Search apartments
  • Classifieds
    • Place an Ad
« In case you missed it … County Council hears from public on UGA debate
SecState: Investigating signature gatherer fraud on income tax initiative, but isolated incident shouldn’t affect signature check »

Politifact: Wall Street reform bill does not provide bailouts. NYT: The issue is more nuanced

Republican U.S. Senate candidate Dino Rossi has finally come out today in opposition to the Wall Street reform bill the senate is considering, and taking aim at U.S. Sen. Patty Murray,D-Wash., for supporting what he says is legislation that will allow for bank bailouts.

The criticism comes on the same day that Murray is touting her support for the bill, and, via Twitter and Facebook, bragging about a speech she made on the floor in support of the legislation.

So is the claim that bailouts will continue under the legislation true?

Politifact says no. And the claim has been debunked for a few months now by them. Said Politifact when they analyzed the exact same claim from Republican U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell:

It clearly states that the intention is to liquidate failing companies, not bail them out. To do that, it creates a fund with contributions from financial firms, not from taxpayer funds. We do not see any element of the bill that expressly permits ongoing, “endless” outlays from the federal treasury. … Nothing in the bill “guarantees” future bailouts of Wall Street banks. We rate his statement False.

But The New York Times has an in-depth piece out that shows the issue is far more complicated, just as is our economic system in the first place.

You’ll need to check it out to get the full picture. But, basically, the gist is that while there is specific language barring bailouts, there is flexibility in terms of how a company would be liquidated. The legislation is specifically intended to show the markets that the government won’t act as a backstop against failures, and that one portion of the bill that might allow for what some could perceive as a “bailout” is written in a way that it might never be used. But, they caution, no financial crisis is the same, and that there’s no way of knowing how the legislation might impact a future financial issue without it being enacted.

Said Steven M. Davidoff:

Still, eliminating regulation by deal in a financial crisis is impossible. This is because we simply do not know the nature of the next crisis and the law cannot account for all future possibilities. And sometimes frankly, this deal-making may result in better outcomes.

This part of the bill makes inevitable compromises that will leave some unsatisfied. The bill may not end all bailouts, but it is still a significant improvement toward more effectively regulating the financial system.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 14th, 2010 at 12:53 PM and is filed under Election, National, State, Whatcom County. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

16 Responses to “Politifact: Wall Street reform bill does not provide bailouts. NYT: The issue is more nuanced”

  1. AFY Says:
    July 15th, 2010 at 10:45 AM

    The financial-reform bill that hits the president’s desk this week is a 2,500-page failure that will only create more problems for federal regulators, argues former SEC Chairman Harvey L. Pitt….

    We’re about to receive legislation that could better be entitled “The Lawyers’ and Lobbyists’ Full Employment Act.”

    The bill sets the SEC up for failure. The SEC is given more rulemaking, more studies and more onerous responsibilities than any other financial regulatory body. Worse, the SEC must now regulate 10,000 hedge funds and several thousand private-equity firms, but was denied what many other financial regulators have—the ability to self-fund its operations. The SEC presumably was denied this authority because the members of its Appropriations Committees don’t want to jeopardize campaign contributions from those the SEC regulates.

    In other words: Congress has labored mightily, and brought forth a mouse!

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-07-14/a-failed-financial-bill/?cid=hp:exc

    AFY!!theheelotsheepdog!!!

  2. AmericanByChoice Says:
    July 15th, 2010 at 3:08 PM

    Wonder if any of these 60 stalwarts who voted for this, have actually read the bill? As not-reading-bills seems to be Dimmocrap SOP, I doubt it.
    “We have to pass this bill (said about the Health Care so-called Reform Bill) to find out what’s in it” -Nancy Pelosi.
    Deja Vu all over again.
    REMEMBER ON NOVEMBER 2ND!

  3. Shaun Says:
    July 15th, 2010 at 3:54 PM

    It could do nothing, except maybe benefit small banks who are the prime lenders to small business….

    http://www.mybanktracker.com/bank-news/2010/07/02/financial-reform-bill-could-benefit-small-banks/

  4. Shaun Says:
    July 15th, 2010 at 3:55 PM

    I thought going back to basics was the Republican mantra, but you guys make my head spin with all your spin..

    http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jun2010/sb20100629_183643.htm

  5. Shaun Says:
    July 15th, 2010 at 4:01 PM

    Well now you’ll just have to spin and moan and grump and of course scream a lot of “foul” but like all the other programs Obama has pushed through in one of the most sweeping change waves of legislation …almost ever…the successes will be decried by the right as flukes and the working out of details and fine tuning will be obstructed at every turn.

    http://www2.timesdispatch.com/business/business/2010/jul/15/regugat15-ar-297129/

  6. AFY Says:
    July 15th, 2010 at 4:20 PM

    The financial regulatory bill is a “disaster,” and its proposed consumer protection agency would create a Fannie and Freddie “on steroids,” Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H.

    The bill is a disaster because it doesn’t address the fundamental underlining causes of the economic issue, which were real estate and underwriting,”

    You’ll basically have a consumer protection agency which decides to go out and in the morning and say, ‘well everybody who’s XYZ should have a loan, even though the local community bank says XYZ shouldn’t have a loan, because if we give them a loan, we know they’re not going to pay back,’” he said. “It’s going to become an agency that defines lending on social justice purposes instead of safety and soundness purposes.”

    “You’ve got this Alice in Wonderland tea party atmosphere around derivatives,”

    So they will become even less controllable in the sense of having oversight.”

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/37314297

    AFY!!theheelotsheepdog!!!

  7. Bellinghammer Says:
    July 15th, 2010 at 4:22 PM

    Shaun,

    It takes a 2300+ page bill to go “back to the basics”? huh?

    If this bill was basic and focused on addressing some of the causes of the recent financial meltdown maybe some of it’s definicies could be overlooked. As it is, this is bill is way over the top and doesn’t even address some of the core problems from the crisis.

    Another good example of the Dems serving out Rahm’s’ mantra of:

    You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste; it’s an opportunity to do important things that you would otherwise avoid

  8. Shaun Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 9:33 AM

    Hammer time, Says who? Fox News? You’re not paying attention to the overwhelming press on this.

    You have not responded to any of the points or issues in the linked articles.

    You have just spewed “..deficiencies…” from the cheap seats, but not enumerated any of your hidden points. Consequently, since I’m not Carnac, I’ll just note that you vote no but the “deficiencies” are in you telling us why…

  9. Shaun Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 9:38 AM

    AFY, even those of your own breed are disappointed in the constant chants of no to everything…

    And if you listen to Judd Greg, well lo siento, you are what you read….

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/15/gop-senator-on-financial_n_538717.html

  10. AFY Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 10:33 AM

    The Dodd-Frank bill does nothing to deal with Wall Street’s central problem: systemic non-disclosure.

    Dodd-Frank is a full-employment act for regulators that addresses everything but the root causes of the financial collapse. It serves up a dog’s breakfast covering proprietary trading, consumer financial protection, derivatives trading, executive pay, credit card fees, whistle-blowers, minority inclusion and Congolese minerals. Dodd-Frank also mandates 68 new studies of carbon markets, Chinese drywalls, and person-to-person lending, and many other irrelevancies.

    None of this deals with the central problem–Wall Street’s ability to hide behind claims of proprietary information to facilitate the production and sale of trillions of dollars in securities whose true values are almost impossible for outsiders to determine.

    Dodd-Frank is not just a prescription for regulatory sclerosis. It is a bonanza for Wall Street lobbyists and lawyers, who will help determine what this law’s 283,985 words actually mean.

    http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/15/dodd-frank-failure-regulation-opinions-contributors-james-henry-laurence-kotlikoff-wall-street.html

    AFY!!theheelotsheepdog!!!

  11. Shaun Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 10:38 AM

    It was never supposed to be a one fix solution. It is a foundation…

  12. AFY Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 10:41 AM

    A foundation for failure!

    AFY!!theheelotsheepdog!!!

  13. g.h.kirsch Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 10:44 AM

    The culture on Wall Street (and in Washington for that matter) could easily be changed with a few high profile prison terms. These guys are the dons of white collar crime. Yes, crime. Unfortunately, there is no sheriff.

  14. Davesix Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 11:54 AM

    For once, I agree with Mr. Kirsch.
    The prospect of prison would clear a mind or two.

    About the bill: If it was passed by this Congress, it’s a bad bill.

  15. g.h.kirsch Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 1:47 PM

    Dave, may I remind you also agreed on Cap & Trade.

  16. Davesix Says:
    July 16th, 2010 at 6:11 PM

    My apologies!
    I certainly did.
    Actually, I agree with much of what you write, and we disagree mostly about details, while we agree about corrupt process in Washington.

    Politics blog
    By Sam Taylor
    Sam Taylor has covered government and politics since coming to The Bellingham Herald in 2006. He is a graduate of the University of Idaho School of Journalism and Mass Media, and interned at four other newspapers prior to moving to Western Washington with his wife, Kathryn.

    Have a news tip or want to chat? Send him e-mail by clicking here or call him directly at 715-2263.

    The Politics Blog has one rule as of now: be civil. You know that Golden Rule you tell your children about? Yeah, there you go.

    Please provide a valid e-mail address on your comments. It will not be visible to other commenters.
    Get Top Stories via Twitter Follow on Twitter: bhampolitics
    Follow us on Facebook Facebook Fan page
    SEARCH
  • 2010 Election

    • Candidate websites

    • 2nd CD Profiles

    • Herald Elections

    • Auditor's Office Elections Division

    • Voters' Guide

    • Public Disclosure Commission

    • Federal Elections Commission
  • Categories

  • Recent Comments

    • Mark Flanders on Probably a final update …
    • Shaun on The Daily Show let’s you in on a little secret that Fox News wouldn’t
    • Todd2 on The Daily Show let’s you in on a little secret that Fox News wouldn’t
    • Todd2 on Probably a final update …
    • Dean on PubliCola: Sen. Murray is tone-deaf to public’s woes
  • LOCAL BLOGS

    • Adventures o’a Bhammer
    • Against The Leviathan
    • Armies of Compassion
    • Bellingham Politics and Economics
    • Birch Bay Blog
    • Brown Eyed Girl
    • Clearly Conservative
    • Confessions of a Post-Oklahoman
    • Eye on Whatcom
    • Ferndale and Beyond
    • Fish & Bicycles
    • FourthCorner
    • HamsterTalk
    • Hangin’ in the ‘Ham
    • Latte Republic
    • Meneltarma
    • Neighborhood Schools Coalition
    • NorwestReview
    • NWCitizen
    • The Parkenfarker Group
    • Twilight Zoning
    • Wally Wonders Why
    • Washington Outsiders
  • LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS

    • B’ham TEA Party
    • League of Women Voters
    • Washington Eagle Forum
    • Whatcom County Democrats
    • Whatcom County Republicans
  • OLD BLOG ARCHIVE

    • CLICK HERE
  • OPEN GOVERNMENT

    • Local Open Government
    • No Leaky Buckets
    • Open-Government Blog
    • Unredacted
    • Washington Coalition for Open Government
  • OTHER WASHINGTON MEDIA BLOGS

    • Adam Wilson Blog - The Olympian
    • Capitol Record - TVW
    • Eye on Olympia - The Spokesman-Review
    • Political Buzz - Tacoma News Tribune
    • Politics Northwest - The Seattle Times
    • Publicola
    • SeattlePostGlobe
    • Slog
    • Spin Control - Spokesman-Review
    • Strange Bedfellows - Seattle Post-Intelligencer
  • PUBLIC OFFICIALS' BLOGS

    • County Councilman Carl Weimer
    • County Councilman Ken Mann
  • WASHINGTON POLITICS SITES

    • Olympia Policy Watch - Washington Policy Center
    • Ridenbaugh Press
    • Schmudget - Washington Budget & Policy Center
    • Washington Votes
  • Archives

    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
The Bellingham Herald
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • About our ads
  • Copyright
  • About Bellingham Herald
  • About the McClatchy Company